Reassessing Nuclear Deterrence: Impacts on Global Security and International Relations

Abstract

In the context of an increasingly multipolar world and evolving geopolitical tensions, the doctrine of nuclear deterrence remains a pivotal yet contentious component of international security. This article provides a comprehensive reassessment of nuclear deterrence, analyzing its impacts on global security and international relations. The paper begins by reviewing the historical evolution of nuclear deterrence, highlighting its role during the Cold War and its adaptation to post-Cold War contexts. It then explores the implications of modern advancements such as cyber capabilities, precision-guided munitions, and emerging strategic technologies on nuclear deterrence. By evaluating the effectiveness of deterrence in preventing nuclear escalation and its influence on arms control agreements and regional security dynamics, the study underscores the complexity of maintaining strategic stability in a rapidly changing global environment. The primary research question that arises is: Is nuclear deterrence still effective in preventing wars in an age of shifting global power structures? To answer this question, a descriptive-explanatory research method has been employed, and information has been gathered through library sources. The findings suggest that while nuclear deterrence continues to be a significant factor in national security strategies, it is no longer as effective as it used to be in the cold war era. The study of this topic is crucial for understanding how evolving geopolitical dynamics and technological advancements influence the effectiveness of nuclear deterrence strategies. It provides insights into adapting traditional deterrence models to address contemporary threats, ensuring continued global stability and conflict prevention in a rapidly changing international landscape.