Contract Farming in the Agricultural Sector: A Narrative Review of Historical Development, Typologies, and Multidimensional Outcome

Authors

  • Sanaullah Sanjar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71082/9bffzh60

Keywords:

contract farming, production contracts, smallholders, bargaining power, narrative review.

Abstract

Contract farming has documented origins in the colonial period of the late 
nineteenth century and spread widely from the 1980s, alongside market 
liberalization. Today it is used in many countries to reduce production and 
marketing uncertainty. This narrative review synthesizes the literature on 
the concept, historical development, typologies, and reported advantages 
and disadvantages of contract farming. It responds to three gaps in earlier 
reviews: a concentration on economic outcomes, a regional or commodity
specific focus, and limited incorporation of recent evidence. Twenty-nine 
sources published between 1963 and 2025 were retained through a 
structured search of Google Scholar, Scopus, and JSTOR and analyzed 
thematically. The findings are interpreted through a contingency 
framework in which contract design, bargaining power, the institutional 
environment, market conditions, and product characteristics jointly shape 
outcomes. The reviewed studies report income gains, improved access to 
inputs, and technology transfer, but also unequal bargaining power, 
uneven distribution of benefits, land concentration, and environmental 
pressure from input-intensive production. Five patterns emerge: outcomes 
are conditional rather than inherent; bargaining asymmetries persist; 
environmental effects are under-researched; evidence on long-term effects 
is thin; and productivity gains do not automatically become profits. 
Recommendations are addressed to governments, farmer organizations, 
agribusiness firms, development agencies, and researchers. 

Downloads

Published

2026-10-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Contract Farming in the Agricultural Sector: A Narrative Review of Historical Development, Typologies, and Multidimensional Outcome. (2026). Kunduz University International Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences, 3(3), 370-385. https://doi.org/10.71082/9bffzh60

Similar Articles

11-20 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.